Texts
inherently “mean” something- the same “something”- regardless of who’s reading
them. This statement can be seen as fallacious because everyone has their own
way of thinking and interpreting. We frequently try to connect what we read to
everything we already know, resulting in people interpreting what they read
differently from others. The way you interpret the meaning depends on who you
are and your situation. Not everyone has to agree upon a text meaning the same
thing. However, most readers should get the same basic meaning from the
author’s intended audience. Many factors come into play while figuring
out if two or more readers get the same meaning out of a text. Some of these
factors include how the reader comprehends the text, if the text is poorly
written, or the point of view the reader has.
Comprehension
is very important when reading and being able to understand the significance of
the text. If the text is not written well the reader will have a hard time
interpreting and will probably get a different meaning out of the text. David
N. Rapp and Paul van den Broek, in “Dynamic Text Comprehension,” talks about
how “They depict reading comprehension as an ongoing process involving
fluctuations in the activation of concepts as the reader proceeds through the
text, resulting in a gradually emerging interpretation of the material.
Features of texts and characteristics of the reader jointly and interactively
affect these fluctuations, influencing and being influenced by the reader’s
understanding and memory of what is read” (276). Comprehension is very
important when interpreting the meaning of an article and if one is unable to
do this it will result in an unclear and different meaning than what another
person interprets it as.
No comments:
Post a Comment